Tree Fund header image

Jack Kimmel International Grant Program

Please review the following information before proceeding to the online application.

 

Note:  Due to the similarity of the Jack Kimmel International Grant and John Z. Duling Grant, TREE Fund requests that applicants submit to only one of these programs per unique project and funding cycle.  Related but unique projects submitted across programs may be considered within a given funding cycle.  If identical proposals/projects are submitted to both funding programs within one funding cycle, neither will be considered for review.

 

The Jack Kimmel International Grant Program, championed by the Canadian TREE Fund, honors the late Jack Kimmel who was the former Director of Parks for the City of Toronto. He is remembered for his contribution of 46 years of leadership to the ISA and its Ontario chapter. Jack Kimmel grants provide much needed funding to arboriculture and urban forestry researchers all over the world. This grant is administered by the TREE Fund, with participation from the Canadian TREE Fund in the evaluation process.

 

Projects are expected to be completed within one to three years. Grant award amounts are limited to a maximum of $10,000 and will vary depending upon the adjudged value of the project relative to the needs of the arboriculture community. No project may receive more than one award from this program. Please note that funds cannot be used to pay for overhead expenses or student tuition and fees.

 

 

Application Process

Applications are due October 1 and will only be accepted through the online application form.

 

You will need the following to complete the online application:

  • Project’s purpose, significance, design and goals
  • Itemized project budget
  • Information on funds pending or received from other sources

 

 

Priority Areas

The TREE Fund research priority areas are derived from the Revised National Research and Technology Transfer Agenda for Urban and Community Forestry. Proposals in the following priority areas are more likely to be funded, but all proposals will be considered.

 

  • Root and soil management: Many urban tree problems originate below ground. Promoting root development, protecting roots from injury and managing conflicts with infrastructure are issues that arborists encounter regularly. Managing roots includes soil management.
  • Propagation, planting and establishment: Methods of ensuring survival and vigorous growth of trees after planting are of concern to arborists and the entire green industry. Arborists are increasingly dealing with problems that originate in, or could be avoided during the planting process.
  • Plant health care: Healthy plants have more effective defense systems and are better able to resist pests. Complete understanding of plant health may lead to new pest control strategies.
  • Risk assessment and worker safety: Safety is a major concern. It can be a life-or-death issue to both tree workers and the public. Detection of defects, and knowing how they develop, are important. Improved equipment and work practices are needed.
  • Urban forestry: Management of urban trees and forests requires improved understanding of how urban forest ecosystems function, their management, and how they interact with people in communities and at the urban/rural interface.

 

 

Criteria for Selection

Recommendations on grant awards will be presented to the TREE Fund Board of Trustees for final approval at or before the Winter Board Meeting and will be announced within 30 days of their decision. Proposals will be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

  • Potential impact of the topic: Does the project address a problem/issue within the TREE Fund’s mission? Does the project address topics that benefit the everyday work of arborists and urban foresters? Will this project have application to a broad sector of the arboriculture and urban forestry communities? Are there measurable outcomes which will occur as a result of this project?
  • Approach: Are the methodology and proposed analysis appropriate? Is the project creative or unique in its approach to the problem? If this is a technology transfer project, is the transfer vehicle/method appropriate for the target audience?
  • Feasibility: Has the investigator demonstrated appropriate qualifications to accomplish the project? Can the project be completed in the given time frame?
  • Funding: Is there a clear explanation of how funds will be used in the context of the total project budget? Are additional sources of funding for the project being pursued? Is the potential cost/benefit ratio for this project appropriate?

 

Applications will be scored on the following scale:

  • Applicant is qualified (0-10)
  • Applicant has experience (0-10)
  • Project directly meets one or all TREE Fund priorities (0-10)
  • Project has clearly stated need (0-10)
  • Project is clearly linked to arboriculture and/or urban forestry (0-10)
  • Research has practical application (0-10)
  • Methods are clear (0-10)
  • Objectives are achievable within proposed time frame (0-10)
  • Objectives are achievable within proposed budget (0-10)
  • Requested funds are matched cash or in-kind (0-10)

 

The TREE Fund does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, gender, sexual orientation, disability or national or ethnic origin. Current trustees of the TREE Fund or any member of the family of any such trustee are ineligible to receive grants from the TREE Fund.

 

 

Reporting Requirements and Funds Distribution

Recipients will be notified within 30 days of the Board’s award decision. The award letter will include a Grant Conditions and Agreement Form, which must be signed and returned within 30 days of the award notification date. The recipient will also be asked to upload a brief summary of the project (in layman’s terms) and a photo for use in TREE Fund and industry publications.

 

Upon the TREE Fund’s receipt of the signed Grant Conditions and Agreement Form, the first installment (60% of the award amount) will be sent to the recipient. An interim progress report is due to the TREE Fund midway through the project, after which the second installment (40% of the award amount) will be sent. A final report is due to the TREE Fund within 15 days of the project completion date identified in the application.

 

The reports shall supply sufficient information as described in the Grant Conditions and Agreement Form to verify that the grant is being used for the purposes intended and to allow the TREE Fund to fulfill its public reporting responsibilities. The recipient will also be asked to submit photos of the project with the final report. Templates of the Grant Conditions and Agreement Form, interim report and final report may be viewed at www.treefund.org/grants/grant-recipient-resources.

 

To maximize the value of their work, we ask that recipients inform the TREE Fund when their research findings are published or presented at a conference so we can publicize this accomplishment. We also request that they recognize the support provided by the TREE Fund in their articles or presentations related to the project. An electronic slide and TREE Fund logo can be downloaded at www.treefund.org/grants/grant-recipient-resources.

 

 

Proprietary Rights

The TREE Fund reserves the right to negotiate proprietary rights for projects on a per grant basis including copyrights, source codes and/or patents.

 

Grant Management System provided by WizeHive.

Apply Today!

Online applications for the $100,000 TREE Fund Research Fellowship Grant are due Nov. 3.

The TREE Fund is invaluable to our research in the Morton Arboretum Soil Science (MASS) laboratory. A major goal of our lab is to perform research on managing urban soil quality with the intent of improving urban tree establishment and growth. The outcomes of the research have direct application to horticulture, arboriculture, and urban forestry. The TREE Fund is one of the only institutions in the world funding this type of research. Without the TREE Fund this research would not be conducted.

close window